In the previous chapter we saw how to initiate a Mats Flow. However, if you need the result of a Mats Request in this thread, you’ll run into a problem: An initiated Mats flow will not execute in, and definitely not return to, the initiating thread.

Let’s say you’re in a synchronous setting where you need to reply with something which a Mats Endpoint can provide. For example in a Servlet, or a Spring @RequestMapping. If you use a MatsInitiator and perform a request, the reply will come to the Terminator you specified. However, even if that Terminator resides in the same service, there is no connection back to the thread you’re in. Even worse, in a multi-node setup, where you’ve fired up a dozen replicas of this service, the reply will most probably come to an instance of the Terminator residing on a different replica/node.

How can we employ the Mats fabric to provide information in a synchronous setting?


The answer is the MatsFuturizer. This is simply a tool on top of the Mats API - meaning that you could implement this yourself using the Mats API only.

The solution is twofold:

  1. Ensure that the reply comes back to this replica/node. Simple: Use a replica/node-specific replyTo Terminator EndpointId, and thus a replica/node-specific queue or topic.
  2. Block the thread, waiting for the reply. Simple: Make a Map of outstanding requests, mapped on a correlation-id which you set as the state for the targeted Terminator, and when the Terminator receives a reply for a specific correlation-id, it wakes up the corresponding waiting thread, providing the result.

It would be tedious to code up all this each time you need it, taking timeouts into account, collection garbage from never-returning replies (flows that have DLQed), and a few other tidbits, so there’s a tool for it: The MatsFuturizer.

It’s pretty simple to use: You provide the parameters for an initiation, and then get a Future in return. This Future will be completed once the invoked Mats Endpoint replies.

Here’s a futurization:

// Futurization!
CompletableFuture<Reply<TestReplyDto>> future = futurizer.futurizeNonessential(
       "traceId", "initiatorId", "Target.endpoint", TestReplyDto.class,
        new TestRequestDto(100, "A hundred widgets"));

.. and we may for example synchronously wait for the result:

// Immediately wait for result:
Reply<TestReplyDto> result = future.get(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS);

.. or we could put the Future into the async handler of a Servlet.

Unit test here.

JavaDoc of MatsFuturizer here.

Notice!! Please make sure that you never code a Mats Endpoint where a stage ends up executing a MatsFuturization: While it does work, in the good path, it breaks the premise and guarantees of Mats pretty hard. You now have a stage of a Mats Flow waiting synchronously and statefully on a nested, separate Mats Flow. Such a setup have several sharp corners, all revolving around the non-good-paths. For example, if the machine processing this stage goes down, it takes the future with it. But the stage of this “outer” flow will redeliver, starting yet another “inner” futurized flow. And the inner flow may DLQ, which will eventually result in a timeout in the waiting stage of the outer flow, which will retry, again starting a new inner futurized flow - which of course may again DLQ. The big point is that invoking one Mats Endpoint from another Mats Endpoint is literally the entire point of the Mats stack and the request method. “Synchronous nesting” breaks the linearity and asynchronicity of a Mats Flow in a very fundamental way. The MatsFuturizer should only be used on the very outer edges, where you have a synchronous call that needs to bridge into the asynchronous Mats fabric. There’s a document going further into this here.

Okay, creating Mats endpoints, Flow initiations and async-sync bridge: Nailed. But you’re in a Spring setting, and using programmatic Java to configure Mats Endpoints feels a bit last century. Annotations rocks! next chapter (Or go to explore!)